May be taken care of as per the legal provisions and the requirements of
applications.
4. In permissioned blockchain framework, identity, authentication, and role-
based access control should be enforced at appropriate layers of the
technology stack. Access to the blockchain data may be enabled for LEA
as per the applicable legal provisions.
Standards
1. Standardization across the various layers of blockchain technological
stack and applications should be considered as one of the important
activities in framework development.
2. Indian stakeholders should work with the Bureau of Indian Standards
(BIS) and other standard bodies to participate in various global/ regional
technical committees such as ISO standards related to Blockchain and
DLT technologies. They should contribute to the Indian requirements,
study standards relevant to the Indian context/ strategy, and decide on
their adoption and implementation plans.
Government
1. Government should foster and act as a catalyst for the development of the
framework
involving
all
the
stakeholders,
including
industry/ startups/ R&D institutes/ academia/ government departments. It
should also facilitate state-wise blockchain adoption and synergy across
potential inter-sector/ inter-ministerial use cases.
2. Working group/ councils/ proj ect review and steering committees should
be formulated by Government to address various aspects related to the
execution of the strategy and creation of national-level blockchain
infrastructure.
3 . The
basic
technical
parameters
for
on-boarding
any
entity
(industry/ startups/ government organizations) should be defined by the
Government. Interested entities must undergo security audits and
assessments by empaneled agencies before being part of the national-
level blockchain infrastructure.
4. National Blockchain Framework should initially focus on the consortium
model to address the various research challenges and implement relevant
use-cases in the e-governance domain for providing citizen services